Comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between thoracoscopic pneumonectomy and open pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a study based on propensity score matching / 中华外科杂志

To compare the short-term and long-term results of thoracoscopic and open pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. The clinical data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent pneumonectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qingdao University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2016 were collected. Totally 142 patients (55 in the thoracoscopic group and 87 in the open group) were included in the study. A total of 29 pairs of patients were successfully matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative outcomes and overall survival were compared between the two groups using test, χ(2) test, Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test, respectively. Camparion with open group, the thoracoscopic group had longer operative time ((209.7±70.2) minutes . (171.3±43.5) minutes, 2.50, 0.02), more mediastinal lymph node dissection ((): 17(9) . 11(10), =388, 0.02) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.0(3.5) . 9.0(3.0), =285, 0.03). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage time, dissected lymph node number, dissected lymph node station and perioperative complications. After PSM, there were no signifificant differences found in 3-year survival (71.4% . 48.1%, 0.10) and 3-year disease-free survival (67.4% . 47.2%, 0.13) between the two groups. Thoracoscopic pneumonectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with more mediastinal lymph node dissection and accelerating recovery, and equivalent long-term prognosis when compared with open approach.

Clinical study on risk factor associated with gut flora change in patients with rectal cancer during perioperative period / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the effects of the different treatment on gut flora in patients with rectal cancer in the perioperative period.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 64 patients with rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled from July 2010 to June 2011 at the Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Hospital, and randomized into 8 groups receiving different treatments in perioperative period. Factorial design was used to study three factors including preoperative bowel preparation, antibiotics use, and postoperative fasting. Patients were randomized into 8 groups with 8 patients in each group using the random digit table. Preoperative and postoperative stool specimens were collected and diluted, which were transferred to selective medium. Bacteria counts were calculated after 48 hours of culture under constant temperature. The changes in gut flora between the different groups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared to the preoperative parameters, total bacteria, Bifidobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, Enterococcus decreased significantly(P<0.05), while the E.coli count increased significantly. The bacillus/coccus ratio was significantly imbalanced. Preoperative bowel preparation, oral antibiotics, and postoperative fasting were all predominant factors associated with gut flora(all P<0.05). Compared with the antibiotic restriction group, Bacteroides, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Peptostreptococcus, and total bacteria count were reduced significantly, and the bacillus/coccus ratio increased in the non-antibiotics restriction group(P<0.05). In the bowel preparation group, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, total bacteria count, and the bacillus/coccus ratio decreased(P<0.05). In the postoperative fasting group, Bacteroides, Enterococcus, total bacteria, and bacillus/coccus ratio decreased(P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Antibiotics, bowel preparation, and postoperative fasting can affect the number and ratio of gut flora in patients with rectal cancer in the perioperative period, leading to dysbacteriosis.</p>

Effect of different perioperative treatments on gut flora in SD rats / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the effects of different perioperative treatments on the number and proportion of gut flora in SD rats.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Forty-eight SD rats were randomized into 8 groups including the control group, antibiotics group, bowel preparation group, fasting group, antibiotic-bowel preparation group, antibiotics-bowel preparation-fasting group, bowel preparation-surgery-antibiotics-early postoperative feeding group (early feeding group), and bowel preparation-surgery-antibiotics-postoperative fasting group. The rats were sacrificed and stool specimens were collected from the cecum. Stools were diluted and transferred to selective medium. Bacteria counts were calculated after 48 hours of culture under constant temperature. The changes in gut flora between the different groups were compared in terms of E.coli, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with the control group, the total bacteria, Bacteroid, Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium were all significantly decreased(P<0.05), while the E.coli count and the bacillus/coccus ratio were significantly elevated(P<0.05). In the bowel preparation group, the total bacteria count, Bacteroid, Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium were all significantly decreased(P<0.05), while the E.coli count remained stable(P>0.05) and the bacillus/coccus ratio was significantly elevated(P<0.05). In the fasting group, the total bacteria count, Bacteroid, Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium were all significantly decreased(P<0.05), while the E.coli count remained stable(P>0.05) and the bacillus/coccus ratio was significantly elevated(P<0.05). Early postoperative feeding increased E.coli, Enterococcus, and total bacteria count(P<0.05), and lowered bacillus/coccus ratio(P<0.05) as compared to the fasting group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Antibiotics, bowel preparation, and fasting have influence on the gut flora of SD rats in count and bacillus/coccus ratio, leading to dysbiosis. Early postoperative feeding may improve dysbiosis.</p>